1986 Fiat Croma vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1986 Fiat Croma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Croma. (235 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Fiat | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Croma | 280 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 78.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |