1986 Fiat Croma vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1986 Fiat Croma is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Croma (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Fiat Croma weights approximately 343 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Croma. (84 Nm). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Croma | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Croma | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1929 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2210 mm |
