1986 Fiat Croma vs. 1972 Volvo 145

To start off, 1986 Fiat Croma is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Croma (154 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 145 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1986 Fiat Croma.

Because 1972 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Croma (235 Nm @ 2350 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 145. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 145.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Fiat Croma 1972 Volvo 145
Make Fiat Volvo
Model Croma 145
Year Released 1986 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 1778 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 154 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 152 Nm
Torque RPM 2350 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1290 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2620 mm