1986 Fiat Croma vs. 1975 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 1986 Fiat Croma is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 80 kg more than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Because 1975 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 1975 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Croma | 240 C |
Year Released | 1986 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |