1986 Fiat Croma vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1986 Fiat Croma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Croma (120 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Croma (165 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1986 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Croma | 66 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |