1986 Fiat Croma vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1986 Fiat Croma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Fiat Croma weights approximately 245 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Croma | 323 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |