1986 Fiat Croma vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (200 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1986 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 1986 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Fiat | Acura |
Model | Croma | TL |
Year Released | 1986 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1583 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2840 mm |