1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 1,583 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Fiat Croma weights approximately 639 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Croma. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Croma | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Fiat | Lotus |
| Model | Croma | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1583 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Top Speed | 182 km/hour | 241 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2420 mm |
