1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 352 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Croma. (235 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Croma | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
| Make | Fiat | Marcos |
| Model | Croma | Mantis |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 506 HP |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 613 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 283 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2290 mm |
