1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2003 Mazda Kusabi
To start off, 2003 Mazda Kusabi is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 1,583 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Kusabi (108 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Kusabi should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Fiat Croma weights approximately 10 kg more than 2003 Mazda Kusabi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Kusabi (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Croma. (127 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Kusabi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 2003 Mazda Kusabi | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Croma | Kusabi |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1583 cc | 1559 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2500 mm |