1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 1,929 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Fiat Croma weights approximately 845 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Fiat | Westfield |
Model | Croma | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1929 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |