1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (154 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1094 kg more than 1986 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Croma. (235 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Croma | Armada |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3140 mm |