1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Croma (154 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (63 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 13 kg more than 1986 Fiat Croma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Croma (235 Nm @ 2350 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (125 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1986 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Fiat Croma 2004 Volkswagen Polo
Make Fiat Volkswagen
Model Croma Polo
Year Released 1986 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 1896 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 154 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 125 Nm
Torque RPM 2350 RPM 1600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 95.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 19.5:1
Top Speed 209 km/hour 160 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1193 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2590 mm