1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Croma (154 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 28 kg more than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Fiat Croma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Croma. (235 Nm @ 2350 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Croma | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2350 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2920 mm |