1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2005 Kia K2700

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1986 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Croma. (127 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Croma.

Compare all specifications: