1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Croma. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (207 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Croma. (84 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Croma. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa has automatic transmission and 1986 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 1986 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Croma | 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Croma | MX-Flexa |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1929 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2760 mm |