1986 Fiat Croma vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda HR-V weights approximately 77 kg more than 1986 Fiat Croma.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Fiat Croma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Croma (235 Nm @ 2350 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Croma | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
| Make | Fiat | Honda |
| Model | Croma | HR-V |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2350 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 162 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1257 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2460 mm |
