1986 Fiat Panda vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1986 Fiat Panda is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Panda. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 330 kg more than 1986 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Panda | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Fiat | Sunbeam |
Model | Panda | Tiger |
Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1302 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2190 mm |