1986 Fiat Panda vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Panda would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Panda. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 605 kg more than 1986 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Panda. (59 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Panda | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Panda | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 769 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 59 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |