1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1986 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 940 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Ritmo | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Fiat | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ritmo | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1950 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3690 mm |
