1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1960 Mini MK I
To start off, 1986 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,116 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Ritmo (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 225 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Ritmo (87 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1986 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 1960 Mini MK I | |
Make | Fiat | Mini |
Model | Ritmo | MK I |
Year Released | 1986 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2040 mm |