1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1962 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1986 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lincoln Continental (300 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1488 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lincoln Continental (630 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 543 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (87 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1962 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 1962 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Fiat | Lincoln |
Model | Ritmo | Continental |
Year Released | 1986 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 7043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.1 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 2328 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3130 mm |