1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 1986 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Datsun 240Z weights approximately 228 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (87 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1972 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Fiat | Datsun |
Model | Ritmo | 240Z |
Year Released | 1986 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2300 mm |