1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1982 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1986 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 60 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1982 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Ritmo | 1982 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
| Model | Ritmo | XJR |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2870 mm |
