1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1996 Mini MK VII
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VII is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mini MK VII is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mini MK VII (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VII should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 105 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VII.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mini MK VII (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (87 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1996 Mini MK VII will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 1996 Mini MK VII | |
Make | Fiat | Mini |
Model | Ritmo | MK VII |
Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6130 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2040 mm |