1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 730 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Ritmo | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 407 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |