1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2000 Proton 400
To start off, 2000 Proton 400 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Ritmo (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 400 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Ritmo (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2000 Proton 400 | |
Make | Fiat | Proton |
Model | Ritmo | 400 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2510 mm |