1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 490 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Ritmo | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |