1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. Both 1986 Fiat Ritmo and 2003 Mazda 2 are equipped with a 1,498 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Ritmo (83 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 2 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 2 (141 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Ritmo | 2 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 45 L |
