1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 746 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (245 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | Taurus |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1586 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2870 mm |