1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 454 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 543 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (87 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Fiat | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Ritmo | CLS |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 507 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
