1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,353 cc, 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 621 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (220 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (87 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Fiat | Honda |
Model | Ritmo | CR-V |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 2353 cc |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 99 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2630 mm |