1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2009 Lincoln Navigator

To start off, 2009 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Lincoln Navigator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lincoln Navigator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (87 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Fiat Ritmo 2009 Lincoln Navigator
Make Fiat Lincoln
Model Ritmo Navigator
Year Released 1986 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1116 cc 5407 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 53 HP 310 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 87 Nm 495 Nm
Torque RPM 2900 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70.1 mm 90.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 105.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 9.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 8 seats
Vehicle Weight 840 kg 1872 kg
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 5300 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 2000 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 3030 mm