1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Chevrolet Optra
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Optra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Optra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Optra (108 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Optra should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Optra weights approximately 341 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Optra (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Optra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Chevrolet Optra | |
Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
Model | Ritmo | Optra |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 81.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |