1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 744 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1664 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3198 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 74 L |