1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Fiat | Holden |
| Model | Ritmo | Epica |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
