1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Ritmo | UTE |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |