1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 160 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Ritmo | Tundra |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 424 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 100 L |