1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2012 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2012 Cadillac SRX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac SRX (308 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2012 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | Ritmo | SRX |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 308 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 79 L |