1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 285 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Fiat | Honda |
Model | Ritmo | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 40 L |