1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 519 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Ritmo | Evora |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1439 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |