1986 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo X670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo X670 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo X670 weights approximately 952 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo X670 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo X670 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Fiat Ritmo | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Ritmo | X670 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1872 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2815 mm |