1986 Ford Bronco II vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Bronco II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Bronco II would be higher. At 2,934 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Bronco II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 80 kg more than 1986 Ford Bronco II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Bronco II | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Bronco II | ATS |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2934 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1806 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2772 mm |
