1986 Ford Bronco II vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Bronco II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Bronco II would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 455 kg more than 1986 Ford Bronco II.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Bronco II | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Bronco II | CTS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2934 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2880 mm |