1986 Ford Fairlane vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,089 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1986 Ford Fairlane. (137 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 162 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Fairlane (304 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Fairlane | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Sigma |
Year Released | 1986 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4089 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2730 mm |