1986 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Kia Pregio
To start off, 2004 Kia Pregio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,089 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Fairlane (137 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2004 Kia Pregio. (93 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Pregio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Pregio weights approximately 48 kg more than 1986 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1986 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Pregio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Kia Pregio | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Fairlane | Pregio |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4089 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2590 mm |
