1986 Ford Fairlane vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,089 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1986 Ford Fairlane. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Fairlane. (304 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Fairlane | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Fairlane | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4089 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 169 HP |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2630 mm |
