1986 Ford Falcon vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 1986 Ford Falcon is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Falcon (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Falcon weights approximately 460 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Falcon (241 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Falcon | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Falcon | 616 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 241 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2480 mm |
