1986 Ford Falcon vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Falcon weights approximately 200 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Falcon | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Falcon | Dingo |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2450 mm |