1986 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1986 Ford Falcon. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Falcon.
Because 1986 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Falcon (241 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1986 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Falcon | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Falcon | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 241 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2685 mm |
